Allowed

Raja Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Nov 2024CR. MISC./37185/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought bail in a Bangra PS theft case (IPC Sections 457, 380, 411), not named in FIR, implicated via confessional statement and alleged jewellery recovery. Considering custody since February 2024 and circumstances, bail was granted with conditions including family surety and trial attendance.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 with two like sureties to the satisfaction of the Court below in connection with Bangra PS Case No. 11 of 2024, subject to stated conditions.

Raja Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37185 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2024 Thana- BANGARA District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raja Kumar S/O Rakesh Sah @ Rakesh Kumar Sah R/O Village- Belari, P.SUjiyarpur, Distt.- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 22-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bangra P.S. case No. 11 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 457, 380, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Prosecution case, in short, is that unknown thief has committed theft in the home of the informant and stolen ornaments, cash amounting to Rs. 5,000/- and inverter battery.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case during course of investigation followed by his self-confessional statement. It is alleged that some jewellery

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37185 of 2024(4) dt.22-11-2024 2/3

¶17

is recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that there is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2024 and has five criminal antecedents. Other co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20-05-2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35621 of 2024.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed , on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bangra P.S. case No. 11 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

¶21

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

¶22

the family of the petitioner.

¶23

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37185 of 2024(4) dt.22-11-2024 3/3

¶25

consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

(III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶27

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶28

Raj Kishore/- U T

Raja Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gajendra Yadav @ Gajendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar Verma Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjeev Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shankar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar