Manish Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Mar 2024CR. MISC./70508/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail rejected; Patna High Court Cr. Misc. No.70508 of 2023; Bangaon P.S. Case no.36 of 2023, District Saharsa; offences under sections 302, 304B, 201 and 34 IPC; petitioner Manish Paswan (husband of deceased); alleged dowry-type demand of Rs.1 lakh; custody since 29.3.2023; chargesheet submitted; no criminal antecedent contended; bail denial based on FIR allegations and investigation material including postmortem report; renewal of bail prayer permitted after 4 months or framing of charge, whichever later; Justice Partha Sarthy; order dated 07-03-2024.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after 4 months or after framing of charge, whichever is later. ¶24-25

Manish Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70508 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2023 Thana- BANGAWON District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANISH PASWAN SON OF INDAL PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BANGAON PO AND PS BANGAON DISTRICT SAHARSA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 07-03-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶16

grant of regular bail in connection with Bangaon P.S. Case no.36 of 2023 registered under sections 302, 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, the informant states

¶18

that his daughter who was married to the petitioner herein was tortured and assaulted for nonfulfilment of demand of Rs.1 lakh. The accused persons including the petitioner herein ultimately killed her.

¶19

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case on account of being the husband of the deceased. It was the deceased who committed suicide. The allegations as levelled in

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70508 of 2023(4) dt.07-03-2024 2/2

¶21

the FIR are false and concocted. The petitioner is in custody since 29.3.2023 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶22

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶23

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. and the material that has transpired in course of investigation including the contents of the postmortem report, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

¶24

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer

¶25

for bail after 4 months or after framing of charge, whichever is later.

¶26

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶27

Bibhash

¶28

U T

Manish Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Haris Usmani Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Suman Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Asha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Awadhesh Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rajo Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Kamdeo Yadav Vs the State of Bihar