Gaurav Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.68 of 2022, arising out of Kharik P.S. Case no. 236 of 2021 registered under sections 307, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶17

As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on information having been received that the accused persons including the petitioner herein were resorting to indiscriminate firing, the informant reached the place of occurrence. The accused resorted to indiscriminate firing. Coaccused Sintu Yadav was caught along with the firearm, however the petitioner herein managed to escape.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6848 of 2024(3) dt.18-04-2024 2/3

¶20

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Neither the petitioner was caught at the place of occurrence nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. No person was injured in the occurrence and the cause of false of implication of the petitioner is his antecedents.

¶21

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner has as many as nine criminal antecedents against him and cartridges of .315 bore was recovered from the place of occurrence besides arms and ammunition being recovered from the possession of the coaccused who was caught at the place of occurrence.

¶22

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R, his not having been arrested at the spot together with the petitioner having remained in custody for over 2 years since 9.2.2022, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.68 of 2022 (arising out of Kharik P.S. Case no. 236 of 2021), on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge at Naugachia, Bhagalpur on the following conditions:

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6848 of 2024(3) dt.18-04-2024 3/3

¶24

(I) The petitioner shall remain physically present in the trial court on each date of the trial and shall cooperate in the trial.

¶25

(II) In case, the petitioner is absent on any single date for reasons not to the satisfaction of the learned trial court or the learned trial Court is of the opinion that the trial is being delayed due to non-cooperation on part of the petitioner, the learned trial Court may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody till conclusion of the trial.

¶26

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶27

avinash/-

¶28

U T

Gaurav Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gaurav Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sulochna Kumari Vs the State of Bihar

Salma Bibi Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar Sahani @ Pradeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Vs The State of Bihar