Allowed¶19

Sulochna Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Apr 2024CR. MISC./6218/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.6218 of 2024, decided 16-04-2024 by Partha Sarthy, J. — Sulochna Kumari v. The State of Bihar — regular bail; alleged forged B.E.T.E.T. examination certificate verified through Bihar School Examination Board; Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC; Andhramath PS Case No. 162 of 2023, District Madhubani; petitioner in custody since 4.10.2023; no criminal antecedent; charge-sheet submitted; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; Additional Sessions Judge-III, Jhanjharpur.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani. ¶19

Sulochna Kumari Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6218 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2023 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sulochna Kumari Daughter Of Krishna Deo Mandal Resident Of Village - Baghua @ Baghuwa, P.S. - Andhramath, District - Madhubani (BIHAR)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhav Kumar, Advocate Mr. Pintu Kumar Patel, Advcoate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 16-04-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case no. 162 of 2023 registered under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, the informant states that subsequent to the petitioner and others being appointed as primary teachers, on verification of the B.E.T.E.T examination certificate furnished by them from the Bihar School Examination Board, the same was found to be forged and hence this F.I.R.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No forged

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6218 of 2024(3) dt.16-04-2024 2/2

¶16

certificate was submitted by her. The petitioner is in custody since 4.10.2023 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

¶18

for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R, her being in custody for 6 months since 4.10.2023, not having any criminal antecedent and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Andhramath P.S. Case no. 162 of 2023, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani.

¶20

Harsh/- U T

¶21

(Partha Sarthy, J)

Sulochna Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sulochna Kumari v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Kems Service Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Mr. Mohan Kumar Khandelwal

Sisupal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar @ Bhallu Vs The State of Bihar

Salma Bibi Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar