Allowed

Satrudhan Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Feb 2024CR. MISC./6842/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application by two accused in a mob-assault case involving IPC Sections 307 and 302 over a land dispute. Court noted general and omnibus allegations and custody since 25.11.2023, and released both petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties of like amount in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 170 of 2023.

Satrudhan Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6842 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2023 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Satrudhan Sah Son of Shahdeo Sah Vill- Birpur PS- Birpur Dist- Begusarai

¶5

Rajiv Kumar @ Raju Kumar Son of Anandi Sah Vill- Birpur PS- Birpur Dist- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-02-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 170 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 379, 307, 504 and added Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioners have assaulted the Informant and his family members by means of lathi, khanti and rod.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioners and the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6842 of 2024(2) dt.13-02-2024 2/3

¶19

Informant are next door neighbour and due to land dispute, the Informant has falsely implicated the petitioners in the present case. He further submits that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioners rather the omnibus and general allegation of abusing has been made against the petitioners. The petitioners are only the members of the mob. There is a case and counter case between the parties. The petitioners have not given any injury to the Informant or his any of the family members and, thus, no case under Section 307/302 of the I.P.C. is made out against the petitioners. He has further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been stated in Para-3 of the present bail application. The petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 25.11.2023.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that the co-accused viz. Sahdeo Sah and Shubham Kumar have been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 85670 of 2023. He further submits that co-accused Ranjeet Sah @ Katuk Sah and Rajnish Kumar have also been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15 of 2024.

¶21

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6842 of 2024(2) dt.13-02-2024 3/3

¶23

opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶24

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of

¶25

the case and taking into account the period of custody of the petitioners as also there being general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 170 of 2023.

¶26

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶27

rishi/-

¶28

U T

Satrudhan Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satrudhan Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Pandey @ Santosh Pandey @ Munur Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Yadav @ Anish @ Anish Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sukan Kumar @ Sukan Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Ajeet Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar