Allowed

Ajeet Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Feb 2024CR. MISC./6415/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under NDPS Act arising from seizure of Doda and Opium from co-accused's house. Court noted custody period and that recovered quantity was less than commercial quantity, and granted regular bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties, with conditions of family-member bailor and appearance at trial dates.

Ajeet Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6415 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2023 Thana- KOTWA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajeet Kumar Singh S/O Late Lalan Singh Village- Kotwa, Ps. Kotwa, Dist. East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-02-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kotwa P.S Case No. 181 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 8/15/17(c)/18(c)/20(b)(ii)(c)/23/25 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (N.D.P.S. Act).

¶15

3. As per the prosecution case, when the informant along with his team reached at the place of occurrence, where two persons seeing the police started fleeing away, but on chase one person has been apprehended and another person succeeded in fleeing away and in course of search total 44.750 kg Doda (Opium product) has been recovered from house. It is further alleged that 490 gms Opium kept in a plastic bag has also been

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6415 of 2024(2) dt.13-02-2024 2/3

¶17

recovered from the dicky of the motorcycle parked in front of the house of Deep Shankar Singh.

¶18

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 04.11.2023. Petitioner bears three criminal antecedents, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

¶19

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot. No incriminating article was recovered from his possession. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused person, namely, Deep Shankar Singh. It is further submitted that petitioner has no concern with alleged Doda (Opium) and motorcycle. The recovery of contraband is made from the house of the co-accused Deep Shankar Singh. It is next submitted that the recovered quantity of Doda (Opium) is less than commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in this Case. There is no compliance of the Section 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶20

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6415 of 2024(2) dt.13-02-2024 3/3

¶22

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the period of custody of the petitioner and the fact that recovered quantity of contraband is less than commercial quantity, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶23

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kotwa P.S Case No. 181 of 2023 subject to the following conditions:

¶24

(i) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

¶25

(ii) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶26

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶27

Nilmani/-

¶28

U T

Ajeet Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeet Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Pandey @ Santosh Pandey @ Munur Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Yadav @ Anish @ Anish Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sukan Kumar @ Sukan Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Ashok Kumar @ Ashok Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Satrudhan Sah Vs The State of Bihar