Allowed

Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Apr 2024CR. MISC./6478/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving serious offences under the IPC. The decision was based on the petitioner having been in custody for four months and the charge-sheet having been submitted, despite opposition from the State and informant.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6478 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-365 Year-2023 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Yadav Son of Sudhir Yadav R/o vill - Triloki Bigha, P.S. - Nawada Muffasil, Distt. - Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No.5, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP For informant : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Mr. Kumud Kishore, Advocates. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 16-04-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP

¶12

for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nawada Mufassil PS Case no. 365 of 2023 registered under sections 307, 147, 149, 341, 448, 323, 379, 385, 354, 506 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the informant states that five named accused persons including the petitioner herein came variously armed. On the orders of Bali Yadav, Sudhir Yadav struck with a Gadasa on the head of Kanti Devi causing serious injuries. It is further stated that petitioner and Nitish Yadav threatened for Rangdari on the point of rifle. Thereafter,

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6478 of 2024(3) dt.16-04-2024 2/3

¶16

Nitish Yadav is said to have struck Sitaram Yadav with the butt of the rifle and further the petitioner along with Nitish Yadav are said to have struck Pappu Kumar with the butt below his eyes.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. So far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegations besides being general and omnibus in nature, no material injury has been found on the body of Pappu Kumar. The grievous injury found on the informant Kanti Devi is directly attributable to Sudhir Yadav. The petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2023 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

¶18

Application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner is said to have assaulted Pappu Kumar and injuries have been found on him also.

¶19

In response, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations on the petitioner of assault on Pappu Kumar are not substantiated from the injury report.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R. together with the material that has transpired in course

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6478 of 2024(3) dt.16-04-2024 3/3

¶22

of investigation, the petitioner being in custody for four months since 25.11.2023 and the charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Nawada Mufassil PS Case no. 365 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Nawada.

¶23

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶24

perwez

¶25

U T

Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Kems Service Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Mr. Mohan Kumar Khandelwal

Sisupal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar @ Bhallu Vs The State of Bihar

Sulochna Kumari Vs the State of Bihar

Salma Bibi Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar