Allowed

Ritesh Yadav @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Dec 2024CR. MISC./63815/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in PS Case No. 181 of 2022 involving alleged assault and threats. The court noted the absence of specific allegations against the petitioner, allowing a bail bond with two sureties. Conditions under CrPC Sec. 438(2) were applied.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail. Petitioner to surrender/arrest within 6 weeks; furnish bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to S.D.J.M., Jhanjharpur, subject to CrPC Sec. 438(2) conditions.

Ritesh Yadav @ Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63815 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2022 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ritesh Yadav @ Ritesh Kumar Son of Pawan Yadav Resident of Village - Sahorva, P.S. - Laukaha, District - Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Ataur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 18-12-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf

¶14

of the parties.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No.181 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The allegation against the petitioner is to have assaulted the informant by means of lathi, danda , etc. and also threatened to him to not approach the police station.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the allegation as regard to assaulted by means of lathi and danda is not specific against

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63815 of 2024(4) dt.18-12-2024 2/2

¶19

this petitioner rather allegation as regard to assault against this petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that admittedly there is land dispute in between the parties.

¶20

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and there is no specific allegation as regard to assault to the informant, where, allegation against this petitioner is general and omnibus in nature, let the above-named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the trial court within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No.181 of 2022 subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶23

S.Katyayan/-

¶24

U T

Ritesh Yadav @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritesh Yadav @ Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pappu Rai @ Pappu Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Rajkumar Rai @ Dhappu Rai @ Rajkumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Singh @ Mukhia Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumud Kumar Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar