Dismissed

Raj Kumar Singh @ Mukhia v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Dec 2024CR. MISC./37148/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in an illicit liquor case involving recovery of 104 litres. The court noted the petitioner's name surfaced from arrested co-accused, he had two similar criminal antecedents, investigation was at an initial stage, and Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act barred anticipatory bail. Prayer rejected.

What did the court decide?

None; prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.

Raj Kumar Singh @ Mukhia Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37148 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-533 Year-2023 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raj Kumar Singh @ Mukhia, Age about 27 years (M), Son of Vidya Singh, R/O Vill.- Bhagwatipur, P.S.- Udwantnagar, Dist.- Bhojpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 11-12-2024

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

¶13

As per allegation in the FIR, total 104 liters of illicit liquor was recovered.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He next submits that some of the co-accused persons have already been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Benches of this Court and one co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. Petitioner has got two criminal antecedents in the same nature of the offence.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37148 of 2024(5) dt.11-12-2024 2/2

¶16

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. He next submits that if anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner, then it will affect the investigation. Further he submits that petitioner cannot be granted anticipatory bail in accordance with Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶17

On perusal of the first information report as well as impugned order dated 05.02.2024, it appears that the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of the arrested coaccused persons and petitioner has got two criminal antecedents in the same nature of the offence and investigation is at initial stage, moreover anticipatory bail is not maintainable as per provision laid down under Section 76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, so considering all aspects of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶19

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶20

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶21

U T

Raj Kumar Singh @ Mukhia v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar Singh @ Mukhia v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gupteshwar Yadav @ Butan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Prakash Gupta @ Ram Prakash Gupta and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Vishekh Choudhary alias Ram Vishesh Choudhary Vs Ram Govind Choudhary

Pappu Rai @ Pappu Roy Vs The State of Bihar

Rajkumar Rai @ Dhappu Rai @ Rajkumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Singh Vs the State of Bihar