Allowed¶24

Durgesh Kashyap v. The State of Bihar

Bail – Regular bail – Section 30(a), Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Patna HC28 Aug 2024CR. MISC./61681/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Durgesh Kashyap v. The State of Bihar; Patna High Court Criminal Miscellaneous No.61681 of 2024, decided 28-08-2024 by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh; regular bail under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act; Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2024, District Bhojpur; recovery of 480 litres illicit beer from Bolero pick-up; petitioner in custody since 05.07.2024; bail granted on bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to the petitioner on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Bhojpur, in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2024. ¶24

Durgesh Kashyap Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61681 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Durgesh Kashyap Son of Rajkumar kashyap R/o Bhuyan Tola, P.S.Mahanagar, Distt.- Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saroj Kumar Choudhary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 28-08-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

A.P.P. for the State.

¶17

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2024 dated 04.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶18

As per the prosecution case, total 480 litres of illicit beer was recovered from the Bolero pick-up.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the said vehicle. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61681 of 2024(2) dt.28-08-2024 2/2

¶21

stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 05.07.2024.

¶22

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶23

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur in connection with Excise Sadar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2024.

¶24

The application stands allowed.

¶25

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶26

shivam/-

Durgesh Kashyap v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durgesh Kashyap v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajkumar @ Raju Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rahmat @ Rahmat Ali @ Md. Rahmat Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Tabarak Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Aman Amrit Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Pappu Kumar @ Pappu @ Pamppu Vs The State of Bihar