Allowed

Rajkumar @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Aug 2024CR. MISC./26518/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for regular bail, the Patna High Court granted relief to the petitioner in a POCSO case involving alleged kidnapping for marriage. The court directed enlargement on bail with a bond of Rs. 20,000 and two sureties, conditional on physical presence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount; conditional on presence.

Rajkumar @ Raju Vs The State of Bihar — Child Custody and Guardianship | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26518 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2023 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajkumar @ Raju S/o- Birendra Singh @ Birendra R/o- Mohalla - Adarsha Nagar, Near Balaji Temple, PS- Ballamgarh, Distt- Faridabad (Hariyana)

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

Ashok Rai Son of Late Laxmi Rai Village Balabakhar PS- Phulparas DistMadhubani (Bihar)

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Baleshwar Kamat For the Informant : Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 27-08-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Informant as well as learned A.P.P for the State.

¶14

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 261 of 2023, POCSO G.R. No. 14/2023 dated 10.05.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 341, 323, 363, 366A, 376, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, section 4 of POCSO Act and section 9 and 11 of the Child Marriage Act.

¶15

3 . As per the prosecution case, the co-accused persons are alleged to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant for the purpose of marriage.

¶16

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26518 of 2024(3) dt.27-08-2024 2/3

¶18

that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The victim in her statement recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that she was forced to get married with the petitioner and thereafter she went to Delhi. There is no sign of sexual assault found at the time of the medical examination. The victim was not forced or seduced to have illicit relationship with another person. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2023.

¶19

5 . Learned counsel for the Informant as well as learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and stated that the victim is a minor girl.

¶20

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 261 of 2023, POCSO G.R. No. 14/2023, with the condition-:

¶21

(i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26518 of 2024(3) dt.27-08-2024 3/3

¶23

present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable

¶24

cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

¶25

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶26

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶27

guddukr/-

¶28

U T

Rajkumar @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajkumar @ Raju v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar @ Amit Mahto @ Amit Vs The State of Bihar

Mahendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Mamtaz Quraishi @ Md. Mumtaz Quraishi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Rahmat @ Rahmat Ali @ Md. Rahmat Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Tabarak Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar