Allowed

Md Dilsar Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Aug 2024CR. MISC./6146/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband's daughter-in-law dispute: petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a dowry torture and harassment complaint. After mediation failed, the court granted anticipatory bail conditioned on monthly maintenance payments to the complainant's daughter, with bail cancellation on default.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing Rs.10,000 bail bond with two sureties, subject to s.438(2) CrPC conditions and monthly maintenance deposit of Rs.3,000.

Md Dilsar Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6146 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-680 Year-2019 Thana- NALANDA COMPLAINT CASE District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md Dilsar Ahmad Son of Md. Muslim Resident of Vill-Amnama Dargahpar, P.S.- Islampur, Distt.-Nalanda

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Samima Khatoon Wife of Late Ajim Sai Resident of Village-Aungari Mahmmadpur, P.S.- Aungari, Distt.-Nalanda

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Kumar Mr.Rajesh Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 07-08-2024

¶11

Pursuant to order dated 15.05.2024, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed (Report dated 24.07.2024 is available at flag ‘M’).

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the complainant / opposite party no. 2.

¶13

The petitioner, who is husband of daughter of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 504, 498A, 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Petitioner is alleged to have committed torture and

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6146 of 2024(5) dt.07-08-2024 2/3

¶16

harassment with daughter of opposite party no. 2 for dowry.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶18

petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3,000/- per month, starting from this month, to daughter of opposite party no. 2.

¶19

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) per month to the daughter of opposite party no. 2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Hilsa, District Nalanda in connection with Complaint Case No. 680-C of 2019, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-

¶20

“(1) Daughter of opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

¶21

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of the daughter of opposite party

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6146 of 2024(5) dt.07-08-2024 3/3

¶23

no. 2.

¶24

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

¶25

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.”

¶26

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶27

anay

¶28

U T

Md Dilsar Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md Dilsar Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushma Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Saddab Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Prabhakar Vs the State of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Afroj Alam @ Md. Afroj Vs The State of Bihar