Mithilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare Mr.Manoj Kumar Ambastha Mr.Rakesh Bihari Sharan ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 07-08-2024

¶13

Earlier, vide order dated 01.05.2024, the matter was

¶14

referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed (Report dated 24.07.2024 is at flag ‘B’).

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶16

A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant / opposite party no. 2.

¶17

The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14578 of 2024(4) dt.07-08-2024 2/3

¶19

Petitioner is alleged to have committed torture and harassment with opposite party no. 2 for dowry.

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 5,000/- per month, starting from this month, to opposite party no. 2.

¶21

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) per month to the opposite party no. 2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Patna in connection with Patna Mahila P.S. Case No. 14 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as on the following conditions:-

¶22

“(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

¶23

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of the opposite party no. 2.

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14578 of 2024(4) dt.07-08-2024 3/3

¶25

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

¶26

(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.”

¶27

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶28

anay

¶29

U T

Mithilesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mithilesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushma Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Saddab Alam Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Prabhakar Vs the State of Bihar

Md Dilsar Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Afroj Alam @ Md. Afroj Vs The State of Bihar