The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was falsely implicated in an abduction case, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 20,000 with sureties.
Directing the petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bail-bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60703 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-359 Year-2023 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Jitendra RaI Son of Jai Kumar Rai Village-Kohbarwa Ps- Sonebarsa DistSitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Advocate : Smt. Divya Bharti, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 05-09-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60703 of 2024(2) dt.05-09-2024 2/3
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60703 of 2024(2) dt.05-09-2024 3/3
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, named only in a confessional statement and not in the FIR, deserves regular bail despite being in custody.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
vide order dated 25.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42524 of 2024Referred¶16
Jitendra Rai
The State of Bihar
Chandra Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
