Allowed

Ajay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Sept 2024CR. MISC./59552/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after recovery of 639 litres of illicit country liquor. Court considered period of custody and circumstances and enlarged the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail-bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the court concerned, Siwan.

Ajay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 59552 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2024 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajay Yadav S/o Hareram Yadav R/o vill - Bangra, P.S. - Raghunathpur, Distt. - Siwan

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumari Anupam, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 05-09-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2024 dated 23.04.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 639 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the bush.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The said recovery was made from an open place that is accessible to anyone. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The name of the petitioner was disclosed by

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 59552 of 2024(2) dt.05-09-2024 2/2

¶19

the apprehended co-accused person. Similarly situated coaccused has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 19.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 41882 of 2024. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has six antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 06.07.2024.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2024.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

Jyoti/-

¶25

U T

Ajay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Indal Nat @ Indal Nut Vs The State of Bihar

Chandra Prakash Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjay Yadav @ Ranjay Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar @ Amish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra RaI Vs The State of Bihar