Disposed

Nitu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Apr 2024CR. MISC./6002/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC carrying punishment of seven years or less. Following the State's submission, the court disposed of the application in terms of its earlier Naushad Ansari order, permitting a representation to the Superintendent of Police and Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application disposed in terms of the Naushad Ansari order dated 13.02.2024; liberty granted to file representation before SP/IO with web copy of that order within three weeks.

Nitu Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6002 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2022 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

NITU DEVI Wife of Sintu Kumar

¶5

Sintu Kumar Son of Makeshwar Sah @ Shri Makeshwar Sah Both Residents of village - Baijnathpur, Ward No.- 01, P.S.- Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Binod Kumar Poddar Son of Satya Narayan Poddar Resident of village - Baijnathpur, Ward No.- 01, P.S.- Bihariganj, District - Madhepura.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, APP Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

4 02-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP

¶18

for the State along with learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 406 and 420 of the IPC.

¶20

It is further submitted on account of pendency of the present case before this Court the investigation is also pending.

¶21

At this stage, the learned APP submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carries punishment of seven years and less. The said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the O.P. No.2.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6002 of 2023(4) dt.02-04-2024 2/2

¶23

In view of the submission made by the learned APP the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

¶24

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 within a period of three weeks from today and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the direction contained in the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

¶25

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶26

Prakash Narayan U T

Nitu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nitu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arjun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Param Ram Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjeev Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Bijay Chaudhary @ Vijay Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Nanbabu Mishra Vs the State of Bihar

Shashi Bhushan Kumar Vs The state of Bihar through Vigilance