Allowed

Arjun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Apr 2024CR. MISC./13856/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in cases involving liquor offences and cheque bouncing, releasing him to surrender within six weeks upon furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail to surrender within six weeks, furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of Rs.10,000 each.

Arjun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13856 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1076 Year-2023 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Arjun Kumar S/o Mahesh Ray R/o Village Fatehpur PS Ahiyapur District Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 01-04-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a)(b), 32(ii)(iii), 36 and 41(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases.

¶15

Allegation is of recovery of 3086.40 litres of liquor from a truck and a motorcycle.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner or the driver of the seized truck and the motorcycle does not

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13856 of 2024(2) dt.01-04-2024 2/2

¶18

belong to the petitioner and he came to be implicated based on the confessional statement of co-accused Vikash Kumar and Vikram Kumar in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value in the eye of law.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1076 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

Kundan/-

¶23

U T

Arjun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Mantu Singh @ Rohit Singh @ Mantu Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Mahesh Rai @ Mahesh Ray Vs the State of Bihar

Bhawan Giri Vs the State of Bihar

Rambali Sah @ Rambali God Vs The State of Bihar

Bachchi Kunwar Vs the State of Bihar