Allowed

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Golu Singh @ Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Sept 2024CR. MISC./59145/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order granting bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Section 290 IPC and the Arms Act. The court considered the petitioner's custody duration, completed investigation, and lack of specific material regarding his involvement aside from co-accused disclosure relative to the stance of the Additional Public Prosecutor. Bail was granted on the condition of 10,000 rupees b

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to a Judicial Magistrate.

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Golu Singh @ Rohit Kumar Vs The State of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59145 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2024 Thana- SINDHIYA District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Golu Singh @ Rohit Kumar, Son of Ganesh Prasad Singh @ Ganesh Singh, R/O Vill.- Singhiya, Ward No. 2, P.s.- Singhiya, Dist.- Samastipur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Shishir Kumar Shishir, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 20-09-2024

¶10

Heard Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶11

The application for grant of bail to the petitioner who is in custody in connection with Singhiya P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 290 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶12

It is alleged that the police on the basis of a viral video on social media platform apprehended co-accused Monu Kumar Singh. On the disclosure made by co-accused Monu Kumar Singh, the police apprehended two other accused persons and from possession of co-accused Rishu Kumar one

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59145 of 2024(2) dt.20-09-2024 2/4

¶14

country made pistol and mobile was recovered. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by co-accused Monu Kumar Singh as one of his associate.

¶15

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that save and except the disclosure made by co-accused Monu Kumar Singh, there is no material suggesting the involvement of the petitioner. So far co-accused Rishu Kumar is concerned, from whose possession the country made pistol was recovered, he has been allowed the privilege of regular bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. No. 48876 of 2024, the copy of which is placed on record vide Annexure 2 series. The learned Advocate for the petitioner further contended that now the petitioner has been incarcerated since 15.04.2024 and the investigation of the crime is complete and the chargesheet has been submitted.

¶16

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner bears one criminal antecedent apart from his complicity in the present crime.

¶17

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of allegation and the fact that the investigation of the crime is complete and the

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59145 of 2024(2) dt.20-09-2024 3/4

¶19

chargesheet has been submitted, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, rosera, Dist. - Samastipur in connection with Singhiya P.S. Case No. 80 of 2024, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:-

¶20

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the

¶21

trial.

¶22

(ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶23

(iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶24

(iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶25

(v) The court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take immediate step for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds, in

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59145 of 2024(2) dt.20-09-2024 4/4

¶27

terms of the above-mentioned order, shall not be delayed for this

¶28

purpose or in the name of verification.

¶29

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶30

supratim/-

¶31

U T

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Golu Singh @ Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Golu Singh @ Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Pratima Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Tahlani Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Sakal Deo Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Chetan @ Chetan Kumar Rai @ Chetan Rai Vs The State of Bihar