Regular bail application under Sections 420, 504 and 506 IPC arising from allegations that the petitioner, acting as broker, had land transferred through impersonation and received Rs. 15,00,000 from the informant. Bail rejected as the petitioner could not explain the money trail; liberty granted to renew after framing of charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37949 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2023 Thana- AKHODHIGOLA District- Rohtas
======================================================
Sunil Kumar Singh, Son of Late Kameshwar Singh, Resident of Village - Brahaman Tola, Chhapra, P.S. - Akorhigola, District - Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
| The State of Bihar ==================== |
===== | ... ... Opposite Party/s ============================= |
|---|---|---|
| Appearance : | ||
| For the Petitioner/s | : | Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate |
| For the Opposite Party/s | : | Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP |
| For the Informant ==================== |
: ===== |
Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ============================= |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 20-09-2024
Heard Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The informant is represented through Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh, learned Advocate.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37949 of 2024(4) dt.20-09-2024 2/3
informant. It is further alleged that the petitioner falsely stated that he delivered Rs. 12,60,000/- to the elder son of land owner, namely, Umesh Singh.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37949 of 2024(4) dt.20-09-2024 3/3
different person, who was not even the owner of the land in question. It is also alleged that the complicity of the petitioner cannot be denied as he was the signatory and executed agreement to sale in favour of the informant. It is also contended that the petitioner bears two criminal antecedent of identical nature which suggests that he is involved in identical nature of crime.
lata/- U T
(Harish Kumar, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, a broker alleged to have facilitated transfer by impersonation and to have received Rs. 15,00,000, should be released on bail in Akorhigola P.S. Case No. 20 of 2023.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
