Sonu Saw @ Sonu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Aug 2024CR. MISC./58775/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

regular bail granted; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act u/s 30(a); 350 litres illicit country-made liquor recovered from ambulance; driver claim by petitioner's counsel; Excise P.S. Case 113/2024 dated 16.05.2024, Bhojpur/Ara; custody since 16.05.2024; clean antecedent; A.P.P. opposed; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount; Chandra Prakash Singh, J; application allowed 14-08-2024.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on regular bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Bhojpur at Aara, in connection with Excise P.S. Case 113/2024. ¶¶21

Sonu Saw @ Sonu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58775 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sonu Saw @ Sonu Yadav Son of Ayodhya Prasad Resident of Village - Sital Tola Ward No .37, Police Station - Ara Town, District - Bhojpur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shiv Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 14-08-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case 113/2024 dated 16.05.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, total 350 litres of illicit country-made liquor was recovered from the ambulance.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is driver of the said vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58775 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/2

¶18

The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.05.2024 as stated in para. 15 of the bail petition.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur at Aara in connection with Excise P.S. Case 113/2024.

¶21

The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶23

atul/-

¶24

U T

Sonu Saw @ Sonu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonu Saw @ Sonu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Maharaj @ Rishi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Laxmi Kumar Singh @ Laxmi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Khan @ Afjal Khan @ Chottu Khan Vs the State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar