Allowed¶24

Chhotu Khan @ Afjal Khan @ Chottu Khan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Aug 2024CR. MISC./53407/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application allowed; IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 read with 34; Mirganj P.S. Case No. 199/2024, District Gopalganj; knife stabbing of informant's husband; general and omnibus allegation; custody since 26.05.2024; bail-bond Rs.20,000 with two sureties; Patna High Court; decided 14-08-2024; single judge Chandra Prakash Singh; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gopalganj, in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 199/2024. ¶24

Chhotu Khan @ Afjal Khan @ Chottu Khan Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53407 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2024 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chhotu Khan @ Afjal Khan @ Chottu Khan S/O Mainuddin Khan R/O Village- Basatpur, P.S- Mirganj, Distt.- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Javed Aslam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 14-08-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

A.P.P for the State.

¶17

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 199/2024 dated 26.05.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have stabbed with knife in the informant's husband.

¶19

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53407 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/2

¶21

petitioner. Learned counsel has submitted that as per Annexure2, the injury is on elbow which is grievous in nature, caused by sharp cutting weapon. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 26.05.2024.

¶22

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶23

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody and the allegation being general and omnibus, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gopalganj in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 199/2024.

¶24

7. The application stands allowed.

¶25

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶26

atul/-

¶27

U T

Chhotu Khan @ Afjal Khan @ Chottu Khan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhotu Khan @ Afjal Khan @ Chottu Khan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Maharaj @ Rishi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Laxmi Kumar Singh @ Laxmi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Saw @ Sonu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar