Disposed

Ravi Chaurasiya @ Ravi Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2024CR. MISC./58451/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 20(b)(ii)(A) of the NDPS Act concerning recovery of one kilogram of ganja from the petitioner's shop. Court noted the petitioner was in custody since June 2024, that counsel argued the quantity was small and recovery was not from his possession, and granted bail with conditions to cooperate with trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties, subject to cooperation in trial.

Ravi Chaurasiya @ Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58451 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2024 Thana- Panchanpur District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ravi Chaurasiya @ Ravi Kumar S/O Late Mahendra Prasad @ Mahendra Chaurasiya R/O Village- Panchanpur, P.S- Panchanpur, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 21-08-2024

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

¶12

as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection

¶14

with Panchanpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b) (ii) (A) of the NDPS Act.

¶15

As per allegation, on a secret information, the informant along with police personnel reached the place of occurrence. The accused persons tried to flee away after seeing the police party. On search, one kilogram ganja was recovered from the shop of the petitioner.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot. Nothing was recovered from possession of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58451 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 2/2

¶18

the petitioner. The alleged recovery of ganja is in small quantity. The petitioner is under custody since 10.06.2024.

¶19

On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

¶20

has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶21

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act in connection with Panchanpur P.S. Case No. 53 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶22

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

Nirmal/- U T

Ravi Chaurasiya @ Ravi Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Chaurasiya @ Ravi Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sujeet Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar