Disposed

Mahboob Alam @ Dr. Mahboob Raza v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Aug 2024CR. MISC./56847/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of a POCSO FIR. The victim's Section 164 statement indicated her allegations stemmed from parental beating over studies. The court declined to quash but directed the SP, Supaul to decide on chargesheeting, protecting petitioners from coercive steps meanwhile.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to approach SP Supaul with defence; SP to decide chargesheet; no coercive steps against petitioners till disposal.

Mahboob Alam @ Dr. Mahboob Raza Vs the State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56847 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mahboob Alam @ Dr. Mahboob Raza S/O Late Shamsul Hoda R/O Kargil Chowk, Near Airport, Birpur, Ward No. 12, P.S- Birpur, Distt.- Supaul.

¶5

Asma Mehar Bano W/O Mahboob Alam @ Dr. Mahboob Raza R/O Kargil Chowk, Near Airport, Birpur, Ward No. 12, P.S- Birpur, Distt.- Supaul.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Bihar

¶9

Abhinandan Kumar S/O Upendra Prasad Yadav Project Co-Ordinator Child Helpline Care, Supaul. R/O Simrahi, Ward No. 05, P.S- Saharsa, Distt.Saharsha.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N. K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr.Raj Kishor Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 12-08-2024 Heard the parties.

¶13

The present application has been filed for quashing

¶14

the FIR bearing Mahila P.S. Case No. 08 of 2024 registered under Sections 376, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4, 6 and 17 of the the POCSO Act.

¶15

The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the FIR. The allegations are serious in nature but Mr. N. K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel for the petitioners has taken this Court through the statement of the alleged victim girl, who has said in her statement before the Magistrate recorded under

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56847 of 2024(2) dt.12-08-2024 2/2

¶17

Section 164 Cr. P.C., that since she was beaten by her parents because she was not studying properly she had given the statement on the basis of which the FIR has been registered.

¶18

In these circumstances, this application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Superintendent of Police, Supaul with his defence and the Superintendent of Police, Supaul will consider the materials available on record including the statement of the victim girl as mentioned above and take a decision as to whether the petitioners shall be chargesheeted or not.

¶19

Till the application of the petitioners is under consideration before the Superintendent of Police, Supaul and is not disposed of, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 08 of 2024.

¶20

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶21

P. Kumar

¶22

U T

Mahboob Alam @ Dr. Mahboob Raza v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahboob Alam @ Dr. Mahboob Raza v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Yadav @ Amar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Daro Mistri Vs the State of Bihar