Dismissed¶21

Bhola Yadav @ Amar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Aug 2024CR. MISC./20185/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.20185 of 2024; Bhola Yadav @ Amar Kumar v. The State of Bihar; decided 09-08-2024 by Sandeep Kumar, J.; regular bail application; Murliganj P.S. Case No. 254 of 2022, District Madhepura; Sections 147, 341, 302, 120-B, 504, 506 IPC read with Section 27 Arms Act; co-accused Vikash Kumar; custody since 08.09.2023; bail refused; application dismissed; trial expedited.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for regular bail rejected; no relief to the petitioner. Trial Court directed to expedite and conclude the trial. ¶21

Bhola Yadav @ Amar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20185 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-254 Year-2022 Thana- MURLIGANJ District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bhola Yadav @ Amar Kumar SON OF SUDHO YADAV @ KARI YADAV Resident Of Village -Parmanandpur Ward no 11, ps -Murliganj, disttMadhepura

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jagannath Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amitesh Kumar For the Informant : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad Ms. Pooja ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 09-08-2024

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶11

counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

¶13

Murliganj P.S. Case No. 254 of 2022 dated 30.05.2022, lodged under Sections 147, 341, 302, 120-B, 504 and 506 of the I.P.C. read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against 10 named accused including the petitioner. It is alleged that the criminals came armed and fired at the prosecution party and thereafter, Vikash Kumar and the petitioner fired from their rifle upon the deceased.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20185 of 2024(4) dt.09-08-2024 2/2

¶17

petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 08.09.2023 and have no criminal antecedent. He further submits that there is only one gun shot injury on the body of the deceased and therefore, the petitioner may be granted bail.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that whether it is the petitioner or other co-accused, who has shot the deceased is a subject matter of thte trial. It is an admitted position that the petitioner has participated in the killing of the deceased.

¶19