Bail application under section 25(1-b)(a) of the Arms Act arising from recovery of a country-made revolver and cartridges after the petitioner's confession. Considering his criminal antecedents and the arms recovered, the court declined bail and rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55729 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2024 Thana- BANMANKHI District- Purnia
======================================================
MD. HAIDAR SON OF LATE Md. ILIYAS @ Lali Iliyas RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BISANPUR, P.S. - BANMANKHI, DISTRICT - PURNEA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
4 09-12-2024
Heard Mr. Bhola Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55729 of 2024(4) dt.09-12-2024 2/2
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner arrested under section 25(1-b)(a) Arms Act following recovery of a firearm on his confession.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Haidar
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
