Writ petition concerning a Lakhan Vishwanath Apartment flat dispute was rejected as non-prosecution after petitioners failed to take steps for issuance of notice on respondent no. 6 within two weeks as directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8527 of 2016
======================================================
Versus
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shambhu Sharan Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prasoon Sinha, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
granted to the petitioner to take steps for issuance of notices upon Respondents no. 06. Since it was a peremptory order and the said order has not been complied with within the stipulated time of two weeks, the same stood rejected on 17.10.2024 itself.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
perwez
U
Sunita Devi
Satyam Mittal
The Patna Municipal Corporation through Municipal Commissioner
The Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation
The Vigilance Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation
The Executive Engineer, Nutan Capital Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
