Allowed

Vikash Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Aug 2024CR. MISC./55681/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by two petitioners in a Gaya assault case registered for multiple IPC offences including Section 307. The State opposed. The court allowed bail after framing of charge on bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two like sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on bail after framing of charge on Rs. 10,000 bond each with two sureties of like amount before CJM, Gaya.

Vikash Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55681 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2024 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vikash Chaudhary Son of Bishun Chaudhary Resident of Village - Reula Tola - Nabali, Police Station - Atri, District - Gaya.

¶5

Devanti Devi Wife of Vikash Chaudhary Resident of Village - Reula Tola - Nabali, Police Station - Atri, District - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aryan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 14-08-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 69 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 379, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are said to have assaulted the victims.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case due to village dispute. The petitioners are in jail since 07.03.2024.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55681 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/2

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail, after framing of charge if charge has not already been framed , on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 69 of 2024.

¶20

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶21

P. Kumar

¶22

U T

Vikash Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikash Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Tara Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Dileep Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar @ Molha @ Malha Vs the State of Bihar

Suman Kumar Yadav @ Suman Yadav Vs The State of Bihar