Allowed

Suman Kumar Yadav @ Suman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Aug 2024CR. MISC./55661/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in a Manigachi PS case under Sections 363 and 366-A IPC. The victim's Section 164 statement said she eloped with the petitioner due to a relationship. The court granted bail on furnishing bail bonds with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Suman Kumar Yadav @ Suman Yadav Vs The State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55661 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2024 Thana- MANIGACHI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Suman Kumar Yadav @ Suman Yadav S/O Tuna Yadav R/O VillageKanhauli, P.S- Manigachi, District- Darbhanga.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Mithilesh Kumar Yadav S/o Vishnudeo Yadav R/o village-kanhauli, P.S.Manigachi, District-Darbhanga

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 14-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Manigachi P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 366-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of kidnapping the victim girl.

¶15

The victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. has said that she had eloped with the petitioner as she was in a relationship with him. The petitioner is in jail since 14.04.2024.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55661 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/2

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge (POCSO Act), Darbhanga in connection with Manigachi P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024.

¶19

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶20

P. Kumar

¶21

U T

Suman Kumar Yadav @ Suman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Kumar Yadav @ Suman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravindra Rai @ Ravindra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Tara Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Dileep Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Vikash Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar @ Molha @ Malha Vs the State of Bihar