Petitioners challenging termination of adhoc lecturer service were absent. Respondents submitted the termination is already challenged in another pending writ petition. Court dismissed as infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as being infructuous due to pendency of viable proceeding on same matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13430 of 2021
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. Narendra Kumar, AC to GP20 For the University : Mr. Rajesh Pd. Choudhary, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
ORAL ORDER
3 27-08-2024 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13430 of 2021(3) dt.27-08-2024 2/2
However, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the University are present.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
anand/-
U
Shashi Kant Tripathy and others
The State of Bihar and others
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
