Allowed

Guddu Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Aug 2024CR. MISC./52833/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act after alleged recovery of 72 liters of illicit liquor from an orchard he denied owning. The court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing a bond with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: release on arrest/surrender within six weeks on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties to Exclusive Special Excise Judge-II, Siwan, subject to S.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Guddu Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52833 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2024 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Guddu Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav S/o Surendra Yadav R/o village_ Bhagar ,P.S_Siswan ,Dist _ Siwan

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 22-08-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 151 of 2024 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Excise Act.

¶15

As per prosecution case, 72 liters illicit liquor was recovered from Bhagar Orchard.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to malafide intention and ulterior motive. Further submission is that the orchard in question from where the alleged recovery has been made does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner claims

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52833 of 2024(2) dt.22-08-2024 2/2

¶18

clean antecedent.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for

¶20

bail.

¶21

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Exclusive Special Excise Judge-II, Siwan in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 151 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶22

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶23

utkarsh/-

Guddu Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guddu Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gore Rajbanshi Vs the State of Bihar

Prince Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gaurav Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Majnoo Mansoor Vs The State of Bihar

Mehi Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Mohammad Wasiv @ Mohd. Wasib Vs the State of Bihar