Allowed

Upendra Kumar @ Sunny Patel v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jul 2024CR. MISC./50532/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an Arms Act case where a co-accused named him as the person who escaped; no recovery was made from him. The court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds, subject to section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail on bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two like sureties within four weeks, subject to s.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Upendra Kumar @ Sunny Patel Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50532 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-811 Year-2023 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Upendra Kumar @ Sunny Patel Son of Dinesh Patel Resident of VillagePatkhauliya, P.S.- Chakiya, District- East Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 16-07-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner in this application prays for bail

¶13

apprehending his arrest in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case no.811 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, while two accused persons were caught, incriminating articles including a loaded country made pistol with two live cartridges were recovered from their possession. The informant further states that one person managed to escape. On enquiry, the accused who was caught disclosed the name of the petitioner as the person who had escaped.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50532 of 2024(2) dt.16-07-2024 2/2

¶17

neither the petitioner was arrested at the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. The only material against him is the statement of a co-accused made before police. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the FIR and the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Motihari Town P.S. Case no.811 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Saurabh/-

Upendra Kumar @ Sunny Patel v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Upendra Kumar @ Sunny Patel v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Niraj Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Rajan Prasad @ Rajan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ramnath Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanji @Mangani Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Singh Vs the State of Bihar