This order grants regular bail to the petitioner, who had been in custody for almost a year. The petitioner, charged under various sections of the IPC for assault, was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
Directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40552 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2023 Thana- KHANPURA District- Samastipur
======================================================
Upendra Mahto Son of Lakhan Mahto Resident of Village- Sobhan Tara, P.SKhanpur, Dist- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
2 15-07-2024 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.708 of 2023 (arising out of Khanpur P.S. Case no.166 of 2023) registered under sections 307, 379, 354, 341, 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
others are said to have come variously armed and Upendra Mahto, the petitioner herein is said to have assaulted the brother of the informant on his head with an iron rod.
earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 17.10.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. no.66672 of 2023 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40552 of 2024(2) dt.15-07-2024 2/2
months. It has been more than six months since the said order of rejection on 17.10.2023 and the petitioner has remained in custody for almost one year since 19.7.2023.
Saurabh/-
U T
(Partha Sarthy, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail having remained in custody for nearly a year after an earlier bail prayer was rejected.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Upendra Mahto
The State of Bihar
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
