Allowed

Sandeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2024CR. MISC./47734/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in an excise case involving recovery of 300 litres of spirit from drums. The court directed the petitioner to furnish bail bonds after three months, on which he was to be released with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; petitioner directed to furnish bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount after three months, before Special Court, Excise-I, Muzaffarpur.

Sandeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47734 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-559 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sandeep Kumar SON OF ASHOK KUMAR YADAV Village-Simariya Ruchdar, P.S.- Falka, Distt-. Katihar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 06-09-2024

¶9

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

¶10

as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶11

The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection

¶12

with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 559 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.

¶13

As per allegation, on a secret information, the informant along with police personnel reached the place of occurrence and on search 300 liters of spirit has been recovered from the drums.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that nothing was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is under custody since 02.05.2024.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47734 of 2024(4) dt.06-09-2024 2/2

¶16

On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶17

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named is directed to furnish bail bond after three months from today and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Court, Excise-I, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 559 of 2024, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶18

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Sandeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sandeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palak Singh @ Sunita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Shasvat Nath Pandey @ Rohit Vs The Union of India through Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Unit Patna, Bihar

Niroj Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Amar Nath Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Vs the State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Yadav @ Pawan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar