Dismissed

Amar Nath Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2024CR. MISC./21817/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna, in Cr. Misc. No.21817 of 2024, rejected a bail prayer renewed by the petitioner on the ground that the trial was nearing conclusion. However, bail may be renewed if the trial exceeds six months.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail rejected. Petitioner to cooperate in trial. Trial concluded within six months or bail prayer renewable.

Amar Nath Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21817 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2022 Thana- KOPA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amar Nath Prasad son of Late Baidyanath Prasad R/V- Samhota Mathia, PSKopa, Dist- Saran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ===============	... ... Opposite Part =======================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s	: Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv with Mr. Basant Kumar Singh, Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh and Ms. Diksha Kumari, Advocates
For the State	: Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP
For the Informant ===============	: Mr. Narendra Kumar, Adv. =======================================

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 06-09-2024

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

¶13

though the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by order dated 19.05.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 4099 of 2023 but he is renewing his prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner is in custody for more than two years.

¶14

Learned counsel for the informant submits that the

¶15

other co-accused persons had threatened the witnesses when the depositions were returning to home.

¶16

From perusal of the status report which is marked as flag ‘R’, it appears that two witnesses have been examined and two witnesses who conducted the postmortem are yet to be examined.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21817 of 2024(4) dt.06-09-2024 2/2

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the trial is on the verge of its conclusion,

¶19

this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the prayer for bail stands rejected.

¶21

However, if the trial is not concluded within a period of six months, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

¶22

Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the Superintendent of Police, Saran to procure the attendance of the witnesses in the Court below and the Court below is also directed not to give a date of more than ten days for marking the attendance.

¶23

8. The petitioner is also directed to co-operate in the trial.

¶24

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶25

Arish/-

¶26

U T

Amar Nath Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amar Nath Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palak Singh @ Sunita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Shasvat Nath Pandey @ Rohit Vs The Union of India through Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Unit Patna, Bihar

Niroj Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sandeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Vs the State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Yadav @ Pawan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar