Allowed

Hira Yadav @ Navlesh @ Ram Chandra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Jul 2024CR. MISC./25566/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants regular bail to two petitioners accused under Sections 363, 365, and 34 of the IPC regarding a kidnapping-cum-abetment case where the victim later stated she went away voluntarily on her own.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of the petitioners on bail in connection with PS Case no.78 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Hira Yadav @ Navlesh @ Ram Chandra Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25566 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2021 Thana- DANIYAWAN District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Hira Yadav @ Navlesh @ Ram Chandra Singh, S/o Raj Ballav Yadav @ Ballav @ Balram Singh, R/o Village - Sikandarpur, PS Khusrupur, District Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

with

¶11

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 41551 of 2024

¶12

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2021 Thana- DANIYAWAN District- Patna

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Raju Gope @ Raju Kumar, Son of Ram Pravesh Yadav, Resident of Village -Sikandarpur, P.S-.Daniyawan, District -Patna

¶15

... ... Petitioner/s

¶16

Versus

¶17

The State of Bihar

¶18

Birendra Prasad, Son of Rambabu Prasad, R/o Village- Barbatta, P.S.Daniyawan, District- Patna.

¶19

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶20

======================================================

¶21

Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 25566 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 41551 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Kant, Advocate Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Madan Mohan Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶22

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

4 12-07-2024 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶25

The petitioners have preferred this application for

¶26

grant of regular bail in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case no. 78 of 2021 registered under sections 363, 365 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25566 of 2024(4) dt.12-07-2024 2/4

¶28

As per the prosecution case, the informant states that his 12 year old daughter who used to go to the coaching centre to study did not return and was not to be found inspite of search. It is further stated that he was told by the co-villagers that she was seen going on a Tata Magic vehicle along with the two petitioners herein. The informant states that he is convinced that she has been taken away by the accused persons.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner Hira Yadav submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The daughter of the informant returned and her statement was recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. wherein she has categorically stated about being in love and having gone on her own with co-accused Raju Gope. She further states that on learning about the occurrence she returned and stayed at the house of Raju’s friend ie Hira Yadav who got her to the police station. No occurrence has taken with her. The petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2023 and charge has been framed against the petitioner in the learned trial Court on 22.6.2024, certified copy of which is produced in the Court and taken on record.

¶30

Learned counsel for the petitioner Raju Gope submits that the earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 29.11.2023 passed in Cr. Misc.

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25566 of 2024(4) dt.12-07-2024 3/4

¶32

no.73857 of 2023 giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Referring to the order of the learned trial Court rejecting the application for bail of the petitioner, it is submitted that charge has been framed in the learned Court below. The petitioner is in custody since 23.8.2023.

¶33

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

¶34

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R., the contents of the statement of the victim under section 164 of the Cr.P.C., no harm having been inflicted on her, the petitioners being in custody since 10.12.2023 and 23.8.2023 respectively and charge having been framed in the learned trial Court against both the petitioners, it is directed that the petitioner namely Hira Yada @ Navlesh @ Ram Chandra Singh, in Cr. Misc. no. 25566 of 2024, be enlarged on bail in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case no.78 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate I^st , Patna City, Patna and the petitioner namely Raju Gope @ Raju Kumar, in Cr. Misc. no.41551 of 2024, be

¶35

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25566 of 2024(4) dt.12-07-2024 4/4

¶36

enlarged on bail in connection with Daniyawan P.S. Case no.78 of 2021 [Special (POCSO) Case no.34 of 2024] on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge VII^th -cum-Special Judge POCSO, Patna.

¶37

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶38

avinash/-

¶39

U T

Hira Yadav @ Navlesh @ Ram Chandra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hira Yadav @ Navlesh @ Ram Chandra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Prasad Pal @ Shankar Pal Vs The State of Bihar

Parmanand Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Amrita Swaraj Vs The State of Bihar

Md.Imteyaz @ Imteyaj Ahamad Vs the State of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar @ Ravindra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Shivranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar