Allowed

Uday Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Aug 2024CR. MISC./39854/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Sections 302 and 201/34 IPC. Petitioner unnamed in the FIR, named only through a co-accused's confessional statement, and in custody since January 2021; co-accused already bailed. Bail granted with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties before ADJ-IV, Jamui, subject to conditions.

Uday Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39854 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2013 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Uday Yadav Son Of Arjun Yadav R/O Vill-Lakhochak, Ps-Chanan, DistLakhisarai, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 09-08-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

¶15

Jamui P. S. Case No. 5 of 2013 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 365 of 2013 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, on recovery of unknown dead body of a male aged about 30 years, F.I.R. was lodged against known.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and his name has transpired during the course of investigation in confessional statement of co-accused Genori Yadav. Except suspicion there is no other material available on record to show complicity of the petitioner in this case. Moreover, co-accused Genori Yadav has already

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39854 of 2024(2) dt.09-08-2024 2/2

¶19

been granted regular bail vide order dated 13.12.2013 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20322 of 2013. Petitioner is in custody since 25.01.2021

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Jamui in connection with Jamui P. S. Case No. 5 of 2013 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 365 of 2013 on following conditions:-

¶22

(i) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every dated fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates, without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

¶23

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶24

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶25

Navya/- U T

Uday Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uday Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Danish Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hritik Kumar @ Ritik Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Reeta Devi@Gita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Babu Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Mithilesh Mahto @ Mithilesh Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar