Allowed¶19

Ghanshyam Kumar Sah @ Pappu Sah @ Ghanshyam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Aug 2024CR. MISC./39731/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No.39731 of 2024, decided 23-08-2024 by Prabhat Kumar Singh, J. Bail granted under Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 356 of 2023 (Samastipur); 631.830 litres IMFL recovery; custody since 03.05.2024; chargesheet filed; bail-bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties before Special Judge, Excise-1, Samastipur. Petitioner: Ghanshyam Kumar Sah @ Pappu Sah; Advocate: Mahendra Pratap; APP: Md. Mushtaque Alam.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: petitioner to be released on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Exclusive Court of learned Special Judge, Excise-1, Samastipur, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 356 of 2023. ¶19

Ghanshyam Kumar Sah @ Pappu Sah @ Ghanshyam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39731 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-356 Year-2023 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ghanshyam Kumar Sah @ Pappu Sah @ Ghanshyam Kumar S/o- Upendra Sah Village- Lachhrampur Ps- Kalyanpur Dist- Samastipur

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocate For the State : Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 23-08-2024

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 356 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶13

As per prosecution case, 631.830 litres Indian made foreign liquor has been recovered from the house of this petitioner.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. It is further submitted that recovery has been made from a house which is in joint possession of this petitioner and others. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature in which he is already on

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39731 of 2024(2) dt.23-08-2024 2/2

¶16

bail. Petitioner is in custody since 03.05.2024. Moreover, chargesheet has already been submitted.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶18

opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and period of custody, the prayer for bail of petitioner is allowed.

¶20

Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Exclusive Court of learned Special Judge, Excise-1, Samastipur, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 356 of 2023.

¶21

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶22

shashank/-

¶23

U T

Ghanshyam Kumar Sah @ Pappu Sah @ Ghanshyam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanshyam Kumar Sah @ Pappu Sah @ Ghanshyam Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shashi Bhushan Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Guddu Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pintu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Yadav @ Shashi Kant Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Nilesh Kumar Sahni @ Nilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar