Anshu Singh @ Sudhanshu Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 13-02-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a student and despite not being involved in the occurrence came to be falsely implicated in the case when informant is not known to the petitioner. It is next submitted that the name of the petitioner transpired in this case based on the statement given by the local people. It is next submitted that the petitioner is aged about 19 years and is a student and his

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3969 of 2024(2) dt.13-02-2024 2/3

¶17

entire career would be jeopardized, in the event, if he is sent to the judicial custody.

¶18

The Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner and submits that though at para-11, it has been pleaded that the petitioner is a student of intermediate and belongs to a respectable family but then no educational certificate is anenxed with the anticipatory bail application as such the statement made at paragraph-11 is merely a bald statement.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Araria in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 219 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

However, it is made clear that the bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted only when the petitioner at the time of surrender furnishes his certificate of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3969 of 2024(2) dt.13-02-2024 3/3

¶22

Matriculation and the document showing that he is pursuing intermediate along with his identity card showing that he is an student of intermediate.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

brajesh/-

¶25

U T

Anshu Singh @ Sudhanshu Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshu Singh @ Sudhanshu Kumar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Bhagat Vs The State of Bihar

Vipin Kumar @ Vipin Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh @ Guddu Vs the State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Indu Devi Vs the State of Bihar