Allowed

Deepak Malik v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Jul 2024CR. MISC./39271/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in Areraj PS Case No. 13 of 2024 for offences under Sections 399/402 IPC and the Arms Act; he was not arrested at the spot and nothing was recovered from him. The court granted bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to cooperation in trial.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bonds of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to cooperation in trial.

Deepak Malik Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39271 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2024 Thana- ARERAJ District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deepak Malik SON OF LATE RAJENDRA MALIK VILLAGE- ARERAJ WARD NO. 10 PS- ARERAJ, DIST- EAST CHAMPARAN

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar BIHAR

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anang Mohan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 26-07-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

¶15

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Areraj P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399/402 of the IPC and 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

¶16

As per allegation, on a secret information, the informant along with other police party reached the place of occurrence. Seeing the police party, the accused persons including this petitioner started fleeing away. The petitioner became successful in fleeing away but co-accused Manu Malik was apprehended from whose possession, one katta and live cartridges were recovered.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39271 of 2024(3) dt.26-07-2024 2/2

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner was not arrested at the spot. Nothing was recovered from his possession. His name has figured in confessional statement of apprehended co-accused. The petitioner is under custody since 15.03.2024.

¶19

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the period of custody, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Areraj, East Champaran in connection with Areraj P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024, subject to the following condition:-

¶20

(i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

¶21

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

Kundan/-

¶23

U T

Deepak Malik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Malik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Kalam @ Arman Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Patel Vs the State of Bihar

Akash Prasad Kesri Vs the State of Bihar

Saurabh Kumar @ Saurav Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Shankar Kumar Vs the State of Bihar