Dismissed¶20

Munna Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jul 2024CR. MISC./6875/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail rejection; regular bail refused; Patna High Court Cr. Misc. No. 6875 of 2024; arising out of Baligaon P.S. Case No. 113 of 2023, Thana Baligaon, District Vaishali; offences under Sections 363, 365, 34 IPC (kidnapping), Section 3/12 POCSO Act and 3(1)(r)(s) SC/ST Act; petitioner Munna Prasad alleged co-passenger, not named in FIR; trial at verge of conclusion with Section 313 Cr.P.C. statements recorded and case fixed for defence evidence; decided 25-07-2024 by Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey; counsel Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary for petitioner, Shailendra Kumar for the State.

What did the court decide?

The Court found that the trial was on the verge of conclusion, the statements of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. having been recorded and the case fixed for defence evidence. ¶19

Munna Prasad Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6875 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2023 Thana- BALIGAON District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MUNNA PRASAD Son of Late Hari Lal Prasad Resident of Village-Danapur (West of Registry Office), P.S.-Danapur Distt.-Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 25-07-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

¶14

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Baligaon P.S. Case No. 113 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 365, 34 of the IPC, Section 3/12 of the POCSO Act and 3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST Act.

¶15

As per FIR, the grand-daughter of the informant went to School, but she didn’t return home. The informant started searching for her and came to know that one Prince Kumar Yadav had kidnapped the informant’s grand-daughter, after abusing and assaulting her.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6875 of 2024(5) dt.25-07-2024 2/2

¶18

the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has submitted further that the petitioner was copassenger in the train where the victim was traveling and he is not named in the FIR. The victim herself went with her friend to New Delhi.

¶19

The stage of the trial was called for from the learned court below which has been received through letter no. 108 of 2024 which shows that the statement of the accused persons under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. has been recorded and the case has been fixed for defense evidence. It appears that the trial is on the verge of conclusion.

¶20

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, which is hereby rejected.

¶21

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

kundan/-

¶23

U T

Munna Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Prasad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritik Raushan @ Ravan @ Bajrangi Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Ashish Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sarvajeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Azad Hussain Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Kalam @ Arman Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Patel Vs the State of Bihar