Regular bail application in a case under Sections 366/365 IPC, with Sections 302/201/34 IPC later added, arising from Nanpur PS Case No. 66/2020. The informant's counsel stated the trial was on the verge of completion with all witnesses examined. The court dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37381 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2020 Thana- NAANPUR District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Surendra Pandit son of Late Kishun Pandit @ Late Ramkishun Pandit Resident of village- Brahmaul Ps- nanpur Dist- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anish Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pandey (App.84) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as well as learned counsel for the informant.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Saif/- U T
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Pandit
The State of Bihar
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
