Niru Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC13 May 2024CR. MISC./33773/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court Criminal Miscellaneous No.33773 of 2024, decided 13-05-2024, Chandra Prakash Singh, J.; Niru Kumar son of Bablu Mahto, Begusarai; regular bail granted; Muffasil (Begusarai) PS Case No. 413/2023 dated 17.07.2023; offences under Section 120B IPC and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 Arms Act; recovery of automatic countrymade pistol and two live cartridges; custody since 17.01.2023; bail bond Rs.20,000/- with two sureties; application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, Begusarai, in connection with Muffasil (Begusarai) P.S. Case No. 413/2023. ¶¶20

Niru Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33773 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-413 Year-2023 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Niru Kumar Son Of Bablu Mahto Resident Of Village - Pahadchak, Ward No.27, Police Station - Muffasil, District - Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 13-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

A.P.P for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Muffasil (Begusarai) P.S. Case No. 413/2023 dated 17.07.2023 registered for the offence punishable u/s 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶14

3. As per the prosecution case, a automatic countrymade pistol and two live cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶15

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33773 of 2024(2) dt.13-05-2024 2/2

¶17

possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is accused in one more criminal case as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. As per the impugned order vide order dated 12.03.2024, the petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2023.

¶18

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶19

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil (Begusarai) P.S. Case No. 413/2023.

¶20

7. The application stands allowed.

¶21

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶22

atul/-

¶23

U T

Niru Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niru Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rehana Khatoon @ Muskan Vs the State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Panchanand Yadav @ Panchanan Yadav @ Umesh Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav @ Panchand Yadav @ Company Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bijendra Sharma @ Kariman Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Sah @ Rajesh Prasad Sah Vs The State of Bihar