Allowed¶23

Rehana Khatoon @ Muskan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC10 May 2024CR. MISC./8095/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.8095 of 2024; decided 10-05-2024; Justice Chandra Prakash Singh; petitioner Rehana Khatoon @ Muskan; Triveniganj P.S. Case No.454 of 2023; District Supaul; Sections 370(A), 376, 506 read with Section 34 IPC; regular bail; prostitution racket; Panchanand Yadav; Nagi @ Naginiya; custody since 23.11.2023; bail allowed on Rs.20,000 bond with two sureties; counsel Naresh Kumar Mehta (petitioner), Madhuri Lata (APP).

What did the court decide?

Regular bail — petitioner to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Supaul, in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 454 of 2023. ¶23

Rehana Khatoon @ Muskan Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8095 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2023 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rehana Khatoon @ Muskan Daughter Of Md. Basiruddin Resident Of Mogala Ghat, Ward No.05, Nandana, Police Station - Jadia, District - Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhuri Lata, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 10-05-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 454 of 2023 dated 20.11.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 370(A), 376, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, on 20.11.2023 the informant (Dharamveer Kumar Sathi, Addl. S.H.O. P.S. Triveniganj, Saupal) received information, that accused Panchanand Yadav along with his second wife Nagi @ Naginiya and some other females were running their business of prostitution in their old Cinema Hall. Thereafter, a raid was

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8095 of 2024(4) dt.10-05-2024 2/3

¶18

conducted in the cinema hall, the entire Cinema Hall was searched, Police recovered used condoms and mobile phones of the victim and prepared the seizure list accordingly.

¶19

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused Panchanand Yadav . There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2023 .

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul, in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 454 of 2023.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8095 of 2024(4) dt.10-05-2024 3/3

¶23

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶25

jyoti/-

¶26

U T

Rehana Khatoon @ Muskan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rehana Khatoon @ Muskan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raushan Yadav @ Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Mandal @ Rakesh Ranjan Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Nunmani Yadav @ Nunumani Yadav @ Mani Lal Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Markanday Chouhan @ Vikash Vs The State of Bihar

Vipin Sharma @ Bhushan Sharma Vs The State of Bihar