The Court considered a report from the Additional Sessions Judge regarding the progress of trial evidence. Declining to enlarge the petitioner on bail, the application was disposed of by refusing bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32898 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2021 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav S/O- Mohan Yadav @ Mohan Rai Village- Bucheyan, Ps- Sidhwalia, Dist- Gopalganj
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
4 01-03-2024
Heard Mr. Raghav Prasad, learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32898 of 2023(4) dt.01-03-2024 2/2
disposed of.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be enlarged on bail at this stage of the trial?
Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Yadav S/o Mohan Yadav @ Mohan Rai
The State of Bihar
Union of India through Director, NDPS, Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
