Bail application rendered infructuous after the petitioner was convicted and final judgment passed; the High Court disposed of the application without deciding any substantive bail question.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30237 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1044 Year-2020 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria
======================================================
Pankaj Mehta Son of Late Prasadi Mehta Resident of village-Dak Haripur, Ward No. 13, P.S.-Forbesganj, District-Purnea
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Choubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 01-03-2024
Heard Mr. Ranjeet Choubey, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Binod Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State.
(Purnendu Singh, J)
Niraj/-
U T
Pankaj Mehta
The State of Bihar
Purnendu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
