Dismissed¶17

Shyam Kumar Yadav @ Shyam Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Sept 2024CR. MISC./31874/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail rejected; Patna High Court; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31874 of 2024; decision date 25-09-2024; judge Anjani Kumar Sharan; petitioner Shyam Kumar Yadav @ Shyam Kumar; FIR/PS Case No. 310 of 2023, Kusheshwar Asthan police station, District Darbhanga; Sections 467, 468, 471, 406, 420 IPC (forgery, personation, counterfeiting documents, criminal breach of trust, cheating); alleged misappropriation of Rs. 6,26,348/-; Bharat Financial Inclusion Limited field staff; no criminal antecedent claimed; State opposed bail citing witness support; bail application dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Considering the nature of the offence, the learned Judge was not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and rejected his prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case No. 310 of 2023. ¶17

Shyam Kumar Yadav @ Shyam Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31874 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2023 Thana- KUSHESHWARASTHAN DistrictDarbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shyam Kumar Yadav @ Shyam Kumar Son Of Mohan Yadav Resident Of Village - Thengaha Rajanpura, P.S. - Khajauli, District - Madhubani

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravindra Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ahmad Ali ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 25-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶9

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case

¶10

registered for the offence punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

Petitioner is said to have misappropriated Rs. 6,26,348/- which was collected from several members of the Finance Company.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is the field staff of the Bharat Financial Inclusion Limited and he only has the responsibility to demand the due amount of the member and after receiving it, the same has been deposited to the B.C.M. and G.M. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31874 of 2024(3) dt.25-09-2024 2/2

¶14

antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

¶15

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer

¶16

for bail and submits that the some of the witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

¶17

Considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Kusheshwar Asthan P.S. Case No. 310 of 2023.

¶18

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶19

devendra/-

¶20

U T

Shyam Kumar Yadav @ Shyam Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Kumar Yadav @ Shyam Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manju Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

The State of Bihar Vs Sakaldev Prasad Singh

Bhagwan Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Munna @ Md. Neyaz Vs The State of Bihar

Dhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sudista Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar