Allowed

Puja Devi v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jul 2024CR. MISC./30854/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail petition sought release from custody for two petitioners implicated in a case involving assault and attempt to murder. The High Court, considering the possibility of false implication and general allegations, granted regular bail with bond of Rs. 20,000 each subject to specific conditions including appearance in court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to be released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 each with two sureties of similar amount, subject to conditions of appearance in court and having close relative as bailsma

Puja Devi Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30854 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-404 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Puja Devi Wife Of Mohan Manjhi Resident Of Village - Gobindpur, P.S. - Phulwarisharif, District - Patna

¶5

Suraj Manjhi Son Of Sunil Manjhi Resident Of Village - Gobindpur, P.S. - Phulwarisharif, District - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 05-07-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶14

APP for the State.

¶15

In this present case, the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 404 of 2023, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

As per prosecution case, the petitioners and other co-accused persons gagged the informant and took him away to a secluded place where the informant was brutally assaulted by them. When the brother of the informant reached there, the petitioners and other co-accused fled away from the spot. The occurrence took place in the background of fact that the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30854 of 2024(3) dt.05-07-2024 2/3

¶18

informant used to drive a police vehicle and the petitioners and other co-accused persons were having suspicion that he was doing work of informer against them.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. The real fact of the case is that the informant was caught red handed by the villagers setting fire to the hut of one Khelan Manjhi and the informant was handed over to the police but the police party in order to save the informant, who is driver of the QRT team, falsely implicated 8 persons in this case. After much persuasion and approach to the higher authorities, the case of co-accused Khelan Manjhi was lodged by the police vide Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 407 of 2023 under Sections 436, 506 and 504 and Sections 3(2)(iii) of the SC/St Act. The allegations are mostly general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Co-accused, namely, Khelan Manjhi, Rita Manjhi, Dilip Manjhi and Guria Devi have been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench and this Court as well vide orders dated 24.08.2023 and 10.01.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Nos. 53595 of 2023 and 82493 of 2023, respectively. Petitioners are having clean antecedent.

¶20

Learned APP opposes the submissions made on

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30854 of 2024(3) dt.05-07-2024 3/3

¶22

behalf of the petitioners.

¶23

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

¶24

submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the general and omnibus nature of allegation and also considering the possibility of false implication, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/(Rupees Twenty thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIV, Patna/concerned court in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 404 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other following conditions:

¶25

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners.

¶26

(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

¶27

(Arun Kumar Jha, J)

¶28

Ashish/-

¶29

U T

Puja Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puja Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudha Devi Vs Vibha Jha

Krishna Kumar Ojha Vs Jitendra Chaudhary

Veena Sinha Vs Niraj Kumar @ Kundan

Md. Tajuddin @ Tajuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Mahato Vs the State of Bihar

Chhotu Singh @ Chhotu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar