Anticipatory bail application by an accused in a jewellery shop robbery case under Section 398 IPC. The State cited a co-accused's confession implicating him in the case diary. Finding no case for bail, the court rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30144 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2023 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj
======================================================
Sanjeet Kumar Pandey @ Sanjeet Pandey S/O Ashok Pandey @ Ashok Kumar Pandey R/O Village- Deoria, P.S- Rivilganj, Distt.- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitender Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER
3 18-10-2024 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 30144 of 2024(3) dt.18-10-2024 2/3
confessional statement which is an extrajudicial confession having no meaning in the eyes of law. He has been wrongly implicated in this case and the police has deliberately made him accused, despite the fact that Amarjit Kumar never gave the name of this petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 30144 of 2024(3) dt.18-10-2024 3/3
anticipatory bail to the petitioner, which is accordingly rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J.)
sadique/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Section 398 IPC in Vijaypur P.S. Case No. 309 of 2023.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeet Kumar Pandey @ Sanjeet Pandey
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
