Allowed

Tabrej Rai @ Tabrej Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Oct 2024CR. MISC./47979/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, apprehended for abduction of a minor under POCSO and IPC, observing no medical evidence of sexual assault and noting the petitioner's young age and no criminal antecedents despite opposition from the prosecutor.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including fortnightly police reporting for six months and strict appearance at trial.

Tabrej Rai @ Tabrej Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47979 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2024 Thana- PAHARPUR District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Tabrej Rai @ Tabrej Alam Son Of Kalmuddin Rai Village- Pakariya, P.S.Paharpur, Distt.- East Champaran

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Vinay Kumar Son Of Jokhan Patel R/O- Village- Laukahan, P.S.- Paharpur, Distt.- East Champaran

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP For the Informant/s : Mr. Hemant Rai, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 17-10-2024 Heard the parties.

¶13

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection

¶14

with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2014 for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the I.P.C. read with Section 8 of the POCSO Act, lodged on 23.04.2024 by the informant, Vinay Kumar.

¶15

As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that his minor sister was abducted with cash and ornaments for the purpose of marriage and the accused/petitioner is also absconding from the house and upon request, the parents also abused. Accordingly, the F.I.R.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47979 of 2024(4) dt.17-10-2024 2/4

¶18

were in relationship, subsequently, the girl returned and under coercion, gave statement against the petitioner. Further contrary to the statement of the informant’s side, the medical report of Sadar Hospital, Motihari find her age to be 18-19 years. Relating to physical relationship/sexual assault, no such medical report is on record. He has remained in custody since 25.04.2024 (para 15 of the petition). He do not have criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

¶20

bail.

¶21

Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that as per the statement of the girl, she was forced to leave her house along with money, taken to Kathmandu and later returned.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid submission put forward by the parties, allegations are there, the fact remains that no medical examinations so far as the sexual assault/physical relationship is concerned is/are on record, the age of the girl has been opined to be 18-19 years, the petitioner is only 22 years of age having no criminal antecedent and has remained in custody since 25.04.2024, as undertaken by the learned counsel for the petitioner, he shall be diligently appearing in the trial, this Court

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47979 of 2024(4) dt.17-10-2024 3/4

¶24

is inclined to extend him the privilege of bail with conditions.

¶25

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

¶26

bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6^th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

¶27

(i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide ;

¶28

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

¶29

(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his attendance;

¶30

(iv) the petitioner shall in now way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

¶31

(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

¶32

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47979 of 2024(4) dt.17-10-2024 4/4

¶33

criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

¶34

to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

¶35

(Rajiv Roy, J.)

¶36

sadique/-

¶37

U T

Tabrej Rai @ Tabrej Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tabrej Rai @ Tabrej Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharni Dhar Road Nagar Nigam Market Kirayadar Sangh, Vs The State of Bihar

Smt. Sudha Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mushtaque @ Md. Mustak Vs The State of Bihar

Ashwini Singh @ Ashwini Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Lakhindra Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar @ Nanki @ Kallu Vs The State Of Bihar