The High Court rejected the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged cultivation of banned opium poppy under the N.D.P.S. Act. The court considered arguments regarding false implication and co-accused bail but declined relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29786 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2023 Thana- MADANPUR District- Aurangabad
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
... ... Opposite Party/s
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29786 of 2024(3) dt.19-07-2024 2/2
motive. The said field does not belongs to the petitioner. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and similarly situated co-accused has been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 10.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.5400 of 2024 and one co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.9934 of 2024.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
pallavi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the N.D.P.S. Act?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sheopujan Kumar
Shaligram Singh
Amit Kumar
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
